Parta.
Parta — sometimes called Parta.io — pitches itself as "Figma for learning." It's a productivity-first authoring platform with real-time collaboration, element-level commenting, and a Kanban board for project management. Newer to the market and gaining ground fast.
What it's great at.
Element-level commenting
Reviewers click any element — a sentence, an image, a button — and leave a comment pinned to it. No more "third paragraph, second sentence" emails. This single feature solves more pain than most authoring tools admit exists, and is one of Parta's clearest advantages over Articulate Review.
Real-time multi-author editing
Multiple authors can edit the same course at the same time — properly, in the way Google Docs works. Mindsmith offers this; Rise tracks co-editors but with more friction; Storyline doesn't support it at all.
Built-in project management
Tasks, deadlines, Kanban board, and progress tracking are part of the tool. For teams running multiple courses simultaneously, this replaces a separate project-management tool. Niche but valuable.
Brand theming and granular permissions
Theme management is genuinely good — rebrand all your courses with a few clicks. Permissions are granular enough to give SMEs editing access to their sections without giving them the whole course. Both features show that Parta was built with enterprise teams in mind.
A cheap SME licence
The $25/month SME licence is unusual — most authoring tools charge full price for every seat. Allowing subject matter experts to co-edit at a lower price point genuinely changes how teams work.
Where it struggles.
Newer platform, less proven
Parta only emerged from stealth a few years ago. Fewer track-record references, fewer enterprise case studies, fewer integration patterns proven at scale. For risk-averse procurement, that's a real consideration.
No complex branching or simulation
Parta is built for productive authoring of standard content. Like Rise, it doesn't have the variable system, custom logic, or simulation capabilities of Storyline. For high-interaction courses, embed a Storyline file or use a different tool entirely.
Skilljar integration, not LMS-neutral
Parta has a direct integration with Skilljar — useful if you use Skilljar, less useful otherwise. The general SCORM and HTML export paths work, but Parta's pitch leans toward customer-education teams already in the Skilljar ecosystem.
Pricing is enterprise-shaped
Outside the SME licence, the tiers run "Solo / Team / Business / Enterprise" with custom pricing. There's no published per-author price for the higher tiers, which means budgeting requires a sales conversation. Less friction-free than Articulate's flat annual cost.
When Parta is the right call.
Pick Parta when
- Review cycles are slow and painful — Parta's element-level commenting fixes this.
- Multiple authors and SMEs co-create content regularly.
- You're already on Skilljar or building customer education at scale.
- You want project management bundled in.
- You value branding control and the ability to rebrand many courses at once.
Pick something else when
- You need complex branching or simulations — Storyline is the answer.
- You need a proven enterprise track record — Articulate has decades.
- You're a single author working alone — Parta's collaboration features are overkill.
- Predictable, published pricing matters — Parta's higher tiers require a sales call.
- You need a large pool of available freelance authors — Articulate dominates the talent pool.
In practice.
Customer education teams
Product, customer-success, and education teams who already use Skilljar and want a tool that integrates directly. Parta is built squarely for this audience.
SME-heavy course development
Where subject matter experts contribute regularly — product training, regulated industries, technical content — the cheap SME licence and granular permissions are genuinely useful.
Large catalogues with brand evolution
If you have dozens of courses and your brand evolves, Parta's theme management is dramatically faster than re-skinning everything course by course.
Teams that hate review cycles
If your review process is "stakeholders send 40 PDF comments and you decipher them" — Parta's element-level commenting is the closest thing to a fix anyone has shipped.
Need a course built
in your tool?
We can build your eLearning in Parta, or advise on what other tools may suit you. Three-week delivery, transparent pricing, zero drama.